CEMENT THICKNESS OF POST AND CORES FABRICATED BY MODERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY
Abstract
Computer-assisted digital (CAD-CAM) technologies in prosthodontics can be used for the fabrication of posts and cores. Digital techniques shorten the necessary clinical and laboratory procedures and make fabrication easier, quicker and accurate. Extracted single-rooted permanent maxillary incisors were used in the study. For each tooth one metal post was fabricated with a digital technique using SLM fabrication technology (group A) or one by casting (group B) in randomized tooth order. All the posts were cemented with zinc phosphate cement. All the teeth were sliced perpendicular to the axis of the post in four planes. The thickness of the cement layer was measured on four slices with an optical microscope with 60× and 100× magnification lens and was compared between both groups. The average cement thickness for group A was 36.76±17.29 µm in cross-section 1, 62.38±15.24 µm in cross-section 2, 129.42±38.37 µm in cross-section 3, and 142.76±36.35 µm in cross-section 4. For group B the average cement thickness was 18.18±4.6 µm in cross-section 1, 15.36±5.41 µm in cross-section 2, 25.41±13.42 µm in cross-section 3, and 23.69±13.44 µm in cross-section 4. The CAD-CAM post and core fabrication technique had a significantly larger cement thickness in all cross-sections compared to casting; however, the post accuracy was still within a clinically acceptable range.
References
2 J. N. Theodosopoulou, K. M. Chochlidakis, Systematic review of dowel (post) and core erials. J. Prosthodont. 18, 6 (2009) 464–472, doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00472.x
3 R. S. Schwartz, J. W. Robbins, Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review, J. Endod. 30, 5 (2004) 289–301, doi:10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001
4 M. S. Bilgin, A. Erdem, E. Dilber, Comparison of fracture resistance between cast, CAD/CAM milling, and direct metal laser sintering metal post systems, J Prosthodont Res. 60 (2016) 1, 23–28, doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2015.08.001
5 R. Van Noort, The future of dental devices is digital, Dent. Mater. 28, (2012) 3–12, doi:10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
6 T. Y. Marghalani, M. T. Hamed, M. A. Awad, three–dimensional finite element analysis of custom–made ceramic dowel made using CAD/CAM technology, J. Prosthodont., 21 (2012) 6, 440–450, doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00860.x
7 Z. Chen, Y. Li, X. Deng, X. Wang, A novel computer-aided method to fabricate a custom one-piece glass fiber dowel-and-core based on digitized impression and crown preparation data, J Prosthodont, 23, (2014) 4, 276–83, doi:10.1111/jopr.12102
8 J. H. Lee, Accelerated techniques for a post and core and a crown restoration with intraoral digital scanners and CAD/CAM and rapid prototyping, J. Prosthet Dent. 112, 5 (2014) 1024–1029, doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.015
9 F. B. Mendel, 3Shape releases CAD solution for post and core restorations, Dental Tribune Middle East & Africa Edition, 5 (2013) 2, 16
10 M. K. Al-Omiri, A. A. Mahmoud, M. R. Rayyan, Fracture resistance of teeth restored with post-retained restorations: an overview, J Endod. 36, (2010) 9, 1439–1449, doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.005
11 W. Tang, Y. Wu, R. J. Smales, Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth, J Endod. 36 (2010)4, 609–17, doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.002
12 D. C. Holmes, A. M. Diaz-Arnold, J. M. Leary, Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin, J. Prosthet. Dent. 75 (1996) 140–1477, doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90090-6
13 S. Ravanshad, N. Ghoreeshi, An in vitro study of coronal microleakage in endodontically-treated teeth restored with posts, Aust. Endod J 29,3 (2003) 128–33, doi:10.1111/j.1747-4477.2003. tb00536.x
14 S. Erkut, K. Gulsahi, A. Caglar, Microleakage in overflared root canals restored with different fiber reinforced dowels, Oper Dent., 33, (2008) 1, 96–105, doi:10.2341/07-47
15 M. R. Rayyan, R. A. Aldossari, S. F.Alsadun, F. R. Hijazy, Accuracy of cast posts fabricated by the direct and the indirect techniques, J. Prosthet. Dent. 116 (2016) 411–415, doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016. 02.002
16 R. Dautia, B. Cvikla, B. Lilaja, P. Heimelb, A. Moritza, A. Schedlea, Micro-CT evaluation of marginal and internal fit of cemented polymer infiltrated ceramic network material crowns manufactured after conventional and digital impressions, J Prosthodont Res., 63 (2019), 40–46, doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2018.04.005
17 ISO/TS 11405 Dental materials — Testing of adhesion, ISO, ISO, 3 (2015) 1–12
18 E. A. Caceres, C. S. Sampaio, P. J. Atria, Void and gap evaluation using microcomputed tomography of different fiber post cementation techniques, J Prosthet Dent., 119 (2017) 103–107, doi:10.1016/ j.prosdent.2017.01.015