THE USE OF AN INTRA-ORAL SCANNER FOR PATELLAR SURFACE ANALYSIS IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

  • Klemen Bošnjak University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zaloška cesta 9, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia -- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Chair of Orthopaedics, Zaloška cesta 9, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Boštjan Kocjančič University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zaloška cesta 9, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia -- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Chair of Orthopaedics, Zaloška cesta 9, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Drago Dolinar University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zaloška cesta 9, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia -- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Chair of Orthopaedics, Zaloška cesta 9, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Borut Pompe University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zaloška cesta 9, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia -- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Chair of Orthopaedics, Zaloška cesta 9, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Keywords: total knee arthroplasty, patellofemoral congruency, laser surface scanning

Abstract

Using an intra-oral scanner for surface and contact evaluation is a novelty in orthopaedics. We introduced this method to compare the congruence between patellar and femoral component surfaces. The compared patellar surfaces were created either with resurfacing, retention of an un-resurfaced patella or patelloplasty, a reshaping method where both facets are resected to match the trochlear surface. In our prospective clinical study, two patients had their patellar surfaces scanned during knee endoprosthesis (Genesis II, Smith & Nephew) implantation, using TRIOS® (3Shape) intraoral laser scanner. Each patient’s patella was scanned three times. First, the original joint surface was scanned after arthrotomy, then scanned again after reshaping the patellar surface and finally scanned after resurfacing with the appropriate standard implant was performed. The acquired surface data were evaluated using CloudCompare software. A mathematical algorithm was used to achieve the best proximity between these surfaces. Distances between the surfaces were measured throughout 0–120° of knee flexion. We defined the measure of proximity as "contact area magnitude". On average, the contact area magnitude was 2.91±0.82 mm using the un-resurfacing method, 3.19±0.95 mm using the resurfaced method and 3.84±0.91 mm using patelloplasty. Leaving the patella un-resurfaced resulted in an improved contact area magnitude. The proximity of the surfaces increased with knee flexion until 75°. With this study, the use of an intra-oral scanner for the surface analysis and intraoperative congruence evaluation was demonstrated. This method could contribute to a better understanding of patellofemoral congruence during total knee arthroplasty.

References

1 C. Becher, T. J. Heyse, N. Kron, S. Ostermeier, C. Hurschler, M. D. Schofer, S. Fuchs-Winkelmann, C.O. Tibesku, Posterior stabilized TKA reduce patellofemoral contact pressure compared with cruciate retaining TKA in vitro, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc., 17 (2009) 1159-65, doi:10.1007/s00167-009-0768-2
2 P. A. Keblish, A. K. Varma, A. S. Greenwald, Patellar resurfacing or retention in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective study of patients with bilateral replacements, J Bone Joint Surg Br., 76 (1994) 930-7
3 A. D. Boyd Jr, F. C. Ewald, W. H. Thomas, R. Poss, C. B. Sledge, Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella, J Bone Joint Surg Am., 75 (1993) 674-81, doi:10.2106/00004623-199305000-00006
4 A. Takahashi, H. Sano, M. Ohnuma, M. Kashiwaba, D. Chiba, M. Kamimura, T. Sugita, E. Itoi, Patellar morphology and femoral component geometry influence patellofemoral contact stress in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc., 20 (2012) 1787-95, doi:10.1007/s00167-¬011-1768-6
5 H. M. Ma, Y. C. Lu, T. G. Kwok, F. Y. Ho, C. Y. Huang, C. H. Huang, The effect of the design of the femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint in total knee replacement, J Bone Joint Surg Br., 89 (2007) 408-12, doi:10.1302/0301-¬620X. 89B3.18276
6 A. Inoue, Y. Arai, S. Nakagawa, H. Inoue, Y. Yoshihara, S. Yamazoe, T. Kubo, Differences in patellofemoral alignment as a result of patellar shape in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing at a minimum three-year follow-up, Knee., 24 (2017) 1448-53, doi:10.1016/j.knee.2017.08.050
7 Z. T. Liu, P. L. Fu, H. S. Wu, Y. Zhu, Patellar reshaping versus resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty – Results of a randomized prospective trial at a minimum of 7 years’ follow-up, Knee., 19 (2012) 198–202, doi:10.1016/j.knee.2011.03.004
8 D. Shervin, K. Pratt, T. Healey, S. Nguyen, W. M. Mihalko, M. M. El-Othmani, K. J. Saleh, Anterior knee pain following primary total knee arthroplasty, World J Orthop., 6 (2015) 795–803, doi:10.5312/ wjo.v6.i10.795
9 A. Senioris, M. Saffarini, S. Rahali, L. Malekpour, F. Dujardin, O. Courage, Does patellofemoral congruence following total knee arthroplasty correlate with pain or function? Intraoperative arthroscopic assessment of 30 cases, Ann Transl Med., 4 (2016) 279, doi:10.21037/atm.2016.07.21
10 D. J. Wood, A. J. Smith, D. Collopy, B. White, B. Brankov, M. K. Bulsara, Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial, J Bone Joint Surg Am., 84 (2002) 187–93, doi:10.2106/00004623-200202000-00004
11 J. A. Feller, R. J. Bartlett, D. M. Lang, Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Br., 78 (1996) 226–8
12 A. Župan, Ž. Snoj, V. Antolič, B. Pompe, Better results with patelloplasty compared to traditional total knee arthroplasty, Int Orthop., 38 (2014) 1621–5, doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2366-2
13 S. B. Patzelt, A. Emmanouilidi, S. Stampf, J. R. Strub, W. Att, Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners, Clin Oral Investig., 18 (2014) 1687–94, doi:10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y
14 S. Akyalcin, B. E. Cozad, J. D. English, C. D. Colville, S. Laman, Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., 144 (2013) 916–22, doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2013. 04.024
15 R. G. Nedelcu, A. S. Persson, Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis, J Prosthet Dent., 112 (2014) 1461–71, doi:10.1016/ j.prosdent.2014.05.027
16 G. Windisch, B. Odehnal, R. Reimann, F. Anderhuber, H. Stachel, Contact areas of the tibiotalar joint, J Orthop Res., 25 (2017) 1481–7, doi:10.1002/jor.20429
17 H. C. Hsu, Z. P. Luo, J. A. Rand, K. N. An, Influence of lateral release on patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact characteristics after total knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty., 12 (1997) 74–83, doi:10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90051-6
18 C. R. Maurer, G. B. Aboutanos, B. M. Dawant, R. J. Maciunas, J. M. Fitzpatrick, Registration of 3-D images using weighted geometrical features, IEEE Trans Med Imaging., 15 (1996) 836–49, doi:10.1109/ 42.544501
19 E. S. Grood, W. J. Suntay, A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee, J Biomech Eng., 105 (1982) 136–44, doi:10.1115/1.3138397
20 C. K. Fitzpatrick, P. J. Rullkoetter, Influence of patellofemoral articular geometry and material on mechanics of the unresurfaced patella, J Biomech., 45 (2012) 1909–15, doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.05.028
21 S. Matsuda, T. Ishinishi, S. E. White, L.A. Whiteside, Patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty. Effect on contact area and contact stress, J Arthroplasty., 12 (1997) 790–7, doi:10.1016/s0883-¬5403(97) 90010-3
22 B. Mavčič, V. Antolič, R. Brand, A. Iglič, V. Kralj-Iglič, D. R. Peder¬sen, Peak contact stress in human hip during gait, Pflugers Arch., 440 (2000) R177–8, doi:10.1007/s004240000054
23 R. De Santis, A. Gloria, S. Viglione, S. Maietta, F. Nappi, L. Ambrosio, D. Ronca, 3D laser scanning in conjunction with surface texturing to evaluate shift and reduction of the tibiofemoral contact area after meniscectomy, J Mech Behav Biomed Mater., 88 (2018) 41–7, doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.007
24 P. Müller, A. Ender, T. Joda, J. Katsoulis, Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner, Quintessence Int., 47 (2016) 343–9, doi:10.3290/j.qi.a35524
25 R. Richert, A. Goujat, L. Venet, G. Viguie, S. Viennot, P. Robinson, J. C. Farges, M. Fages, M. Ducret, Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression, J Healthc Eng., 2017 (2017) 8427595, doi:10.1155/2017/8427595
26 B. Mavčič, B. Babnik, A. Iglič, M. Kandušer, T. Slivnik, V. Kralj-¬Iglič, Shape transformation of giant phospholipid vesicles at high concentrations of C12E8, Bioelectrochemistry., 63 (2004), 183–7, doi:10.1016/j.bioelechem.2003.09.022
Published
2021-03-16
How to Cite
1.
Bošnjak K, Kocjančič B, Dolinar D, Pompe B. THE USE OF AN INTRA-ORAL SCANNER FOR PATELLAR SURFACE ANALYSIS IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY. MatTech [Internet]. 2021Mar.16 [cited 2026Aug.13];55(1):39-3. Available from: https://mater-tehnol.si/index.php/MatTech/article/view/87