EFFICIENCY OF THE PRODUCT-DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AS A FACTOR DETERMINING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLEMENTATION FOR SUBSEQUENT PROJECT PHASES ACC APQP

Łukasz Rudolf; Marek Roszak

doi:10.17222/mit.2023.1085

Łukasz Rudolf Silesian University of Technology, School of Doctors, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Engineering Materials and Biomaterials, Stanisława Konarskiego 18A St., 44-100 Gliwice
Marek Roszak Silesian University of Technology, School of Doctors, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Engineering Materials and Biomaterials, Stanisława Konarskiego 18A St., 44-100 Gliwice

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17222/mit.2023.1085

Keywords: product development, PDAC, quality planning tools, change management

Abstract

This study presents a tool integrating PDCA Deming cycle and Design for Six Sigma principles to aid component development (especially dedicated for innovative projects). Designed for universal use across APQP (Advanced Product Quality Planning) phases, the tool guides through five key stages: Identify, Define, Design, Optimize, and Validate. Each stage involves specific actions and approvals, ensuring thorough development and risk assessment. Notably, the tool accommodates changing product requirements and validation challenges, allowing for adjustments without project delays. Its adaptability within the APQP framework is crucial for complex product development. The implementation at Tenneco demonstrates its effectiveness in structuring and overseeing development processes and improving project outcomes. Future analyses will delve into its impact and guide further research.

References

1. T.V. Tokmakova, V.I. Vysotskaya, E.N. Tokmakova. Improving Product Quality by APQP and PPAP. Russ. Engin. Res. 42 (2022) 286–287, DOI: 10.3103/S1068798X2203025X
2. Automotive Industry Action Group Association. Advanced Product Quality Planning and Control Plan (APQP), Reference Manual. 2nd Edition. AIAG (2008)
3. Ł. Rudolf, M. T. Roszak, "Tools of product quality planning in the production part approval process." Archives of Materials Science and Engineering 118 (2022) 2: 67-74 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0016.2591
4. A. C. Dzulinski, A. Braghini Junior, D. M. G. Chiroli. Design for Six Sigma: A Review of the Definitions, Objectives, Activities, and Tools, Engineering Management Journal, 35 (2023) 2, 161-180, DOI: 10.1080/10429247.2022.2041964
5. V. Nguyen, N. Nguyen, B. Schumacher, T. Tran, Practical Application of Plan–Do–Check–Act Cycle for Quality Improvement of Sustainable Packaging: A Case Study. Applied Sciences 10 (2020) 6332. DOI: 10.3390/app10186332
6. J. A. Doshi, D. Desai, Overview of Automotive Core Tools: Applications and Benefits. Journal of The Institution of Engineers India Ser. C 98 (2017) 515–526, DOI: 10.1007/s40032-016-0288-z
7. E. A. Cudney, T. K. Agustiady, Design for six sigma: a practical approach through innovation. CRC Press, New York (2016), 349